2,006 results for 'cat:"Negligence"'.
J. Farbiarz rules against a mechanic in claims contending he was injured in a fire that began at an auto repair shop due to oil in a drip pan because evidence did not indicate that placing the drip pan under the car or pushing the pan would have caused the fire, and the shop owner had simply panicked when he poured windshield wiper fluid on the mechanic to douse the flames.
Court: USDC New Jersey, Judge: Farbiarz , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv17366, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: negligence
J. Elrod finds the district court improperly dismissed the flight attendants' injury claims as time-barred. The Texas Supreme Court answers certified questions confirming that certain civil practice and remedies code applies to invoke a prior district court’s subject matter jurisdiction with proper pleading. The code applies here where the Dallas district court dismissed the previous action for lack of jurisdiction and this second action was filed within 60 days after the flight attendants exhausted all appeals from that dismissal. Reversed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Elrod, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 22-20317, Categories: Employment, Tort, negligence
J. Wright finds the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of the wind turbine manufacturer. The dock worker fell from a man basket while unloading turbine blades from a ship and claims the manufacturer's negligent right of control over the details of the work led to his injury. The contract established that the worker's employer was an independent contractor on the jobsite. The worker failed to meet his burden to establish that the manufacturer controlled or had the right to control the work he was performing. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Wright , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 09-21-00177-CV, Categories: Tort, negligence, Contract
J. Bennett finds that the trial court properly found for the city in claims contending plaintiff tripped and fell over uneven sidewalk because neither evidence nor expert testimony indicated the city had constructive notice of the dangerous condition. Affirmed.
Court: Tennessee Court of Appeals, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: M2023-00736-COA-R3-CV, Categories: negligence
[Consolidated.] J. Baltodano holds that the trial court must revisit the restitution claims of four commercial fishers who argue they lost revenue due to a crude oil spill. Neither a mediated civil settlement nor a class action lawsuit bar restitution for commercial fishers who demonstrate direct financial losses from the criminally unlawful discharge. However, the trial court properly denied restitution to oil platform employees who relied on the oil industry since the income they lost when the pipeline shut down made them only indirect victims. Reversed in part.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Baltodano, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: B315256, Categories: Restitution, Environment, Criminal negligence
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Gremillion finds that the trial court improperly found that the Calcasieu Parish Police Jury (CPPJ) was not at fault for a tree falling on a truck and killing the passenger. Dr. Frederick Fellner, an urban forester, submitted an affidavit and deposition that raises a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the CPPJ should have identified the tree as a hazard to the motoring public and thus taken remedial action. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Gremillion, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: CA-23-579, Categories: negligence, Experts, Wrongful Death
J. Gremillion finds that the chemical company may be liable for a tree on its property falling on a truck and killing the passenger. The company asserts that the tree failed because of brown rot in its trunk that it could not have reasonably discovered. However, the family sufficiently alleges that a lightning strike caused the brown rot and that the missing crown, flat top, unbalanced canopy, precarious lien, lightning scar and gap between the roots and the ground all should have been clear signs that something was wrong.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Gremillion, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: CW-23-379, Categories: negligence, Wrongful Death
J. Wicker finds that the trial court properly dismissed a plaintiff's driver's claim against the defendant driver in a three car collision. In this case, the defendant driver testified that he was hit from behind by a third driver and that the impact caused his car to hit the plaintiff driver's car. The police report indicated minimum damage to the front of the defendant driver's car, supporting that he was pushed into plaintiff's car, and the photographic evidence shows a strong impact between the third driver's car and the defendant driver's car. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Wicker, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-489, Categories: Evidence, Tort, negligence
J. Windhorst finds that the trial court properly found for the parish on a pedestrian's claim that he fell into an improperly maintained manhole up to his hips. The parish did not have constructive knowledge about the dangerous condition of the manhole because three days after the incident, a parish employee inspected the manhole and found nothing unusual about it. Also, the parish had no prior work orders for the manhole cover, and there was no history of injuries involving the manhole cover. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Windhorst, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-498, Categories: Evidence, negligence
J. Goldin finds that the trial court improperly ruled in tort liability claims brought after plaintiff was struck by a city vehicle when he stepped off a curb in the middle of a block to cross between two stopped vehicles, at which point the light changed, because the record does not indicate the accident had been caused by negligent hiring and retention of a city employee. Meanwhile, the record indicates plaintiff was at least 50% at fault.
Court: Tennessee Court of Appeals, Judge: Goldin, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: W2023-00437-COA-R3-CV, Categories: Vehicle, negligence
J. Yarbrough grants, in part, the fired employee's motion to compel discovery, ruling the employer must produce documents related to disciplinary investigations of other employees during the same time frame to allow the fired employee to collect comparator data.
Court: USDC New Mexico, Judge: Yarbrough, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv113, NOS: Federal Employers’ Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Tort, negligence, Discovery
J. Soto finds a lower court partially erred in granting summary judgment to a geotechnical engineer who was retained by a preservation group as part of a separate lawsuit over workmanship on a road. That preservation group than sued the engineer, arguing he had failed to adequately inspect the road as part of a settlement agreement. While the preservation group’s claims mostly fail because there are genuine questions over the engineer’s agreement to participate in the settlement agreement, the preservation group can still proceed with a negligence claim over “the professional engineering services that he did agree to provide.” Affirmed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Soto, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00205-CV, Categories: Settlements, negligence, Experts
[Consolidated.] J. Christopher finds that the trial court should have granted the special appearance of the pharmaceutical holding company that was sued by two Texas counties for its role in the opioid crisis. The counties did not show the holding company is the alter ego of the drug maker over which the trial court has personal jurisdiction. Reversed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Christopher, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00202-CV, Categories: negligence, Jurisdiction
J. Smith finds that the lower court properly entered judgment in this negligence suit arising from a car accident. The appellant argues that he should have been awarded damages after the appellee was found by the jury "to be at fault for the accident." However, the jury's finding of zero damages was not "manifestly unjust." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 05-23-00390-CV, Categories: Tort, Damages, negligence
J. Vilardo rules in part for county officials in claims contending an inmate died from acute respiratory failure for lack of proper supervision because evidence did not indicate that anyone other than a single nurse ordered any actions, that the nurse had a prior track record of failing to follow procedure, or that the county trained medical staff at the holding center with deliberate indifference.
Court: USDC Western District of New York, Judge: Vilardo , Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv1689, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, negligence, Wrongful Death
J. Dishman dismisses the individual plaintiff's negligence and malicious prosecution claims against the government based on a lack of jurisdiction. The claims arise from an incident at a medical center that allegedly resulted in the plaintiff's arrest. He was later "acquitted of the conduct" and brought the current claims as a result. The conduct alleged against the law enforcement officers does not support a negligent arrest claim, however, and the plaintiff fails to cite "an appropriate private party analogue for his negligent delay of medical care claim." His excessive force claim remains for trial.
Court: USDC Western District of Oklahoma , Judge: Dishman, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 5:19cv1102, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, negligence
Per curiam, the circuit finds the district court properly denied the parents' motion to amend or correct the dismissal of their claims against a school district after their son, who suffers from cerebral palsy, was allegedly injured by a district employee who helped him use the bathroom on a school trip. The education and disability claims were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parents fail to show the court made a cognizable “mistake” of law under the cited rule of civil procedure. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 23-40474, Categories: Civil Rights, Education, negligence
J. Reiss denies a third-party investment company’s motion to reconsider the court’s order denying its motion to stay discovery in this negligence and contract dispute between Vermont’s financial regulation agency and an accounting firm. The investment company’s former managing member’s motion for reconsideration is granted, however, in seeking stay, the investment company and managing member failed to submit a copy of the criminal indictment that contained false financial statements in an insurer’s liquidation. The managing member’s request for adverse inference immunity is denied as moot. The accounting firm requested a motion to compel, but only the investment company is compelled to comply with the discovery schedule. Its request for attorney fees and cost are denied at this stage but, the court warns the investment company that further non-compliance may result in sanctions.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Reiss, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv273, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: negligence, Discovery, Contract
J. Brown finds that a school district, a principal and a teacher are not liable for the actions of an older student who touched younger female students inappropriately in the context of a student tutoring program. The district’s training of the teacher and principal is adequate and did not lead to the violations of the female students’ rights. The teacher and the principal are entitled to qualified immunity in that a reasonable person would not suspect that a mentoring program would lead to constitutional violations. Although the offending student violated the constitutional rights of the female students, he is not a state actor because mentorship is not considered a governmental function under Texas law, and the plaintiffs have not provided an authority that would support such a conclusion. The motions of the district, principal and teacher to dismiss are granted.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Brown, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv1243, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Civil Rights, Immunity, negligence
J. Reiss denies, in part, a police officer’s motion for summary judgment in this case where he was accused of excessive force and failure to intervene when a physical altercation between a resident and a sergeant happened while the resident was detained inside the police department. She filed claims of assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence and violations of her Fourth and 14th Amendment rights. There is a dispute of facts as to the officer’s failure to intervene involvement in the sergeant’s takedown, a reasonable jury could find that the alleged use of force was extreme, outrageous and intolerable. The claims regarding the officer’s failure to intervene as to the sergeant shoving and punching the woman are granted.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Reiss, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv291, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: negligence, Police Misconduct
J. Douglas finds the district court properly ruled in favor of the pecan farm in this negligence suit. The suit arose from water damage caused by a "120-year flood" exacerbated by the strip miner's groundwater pit's breach, which released a deluge onto the farm's property. Based on evidence presented, including that showing prior breaches, the jury could reasonably conclude it was foreseeable that water would gather in the pit in such large quantities that when it overflows it could flood surrounding land. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Douglas , Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 23-50330, Categories: Agriculture, Water, negligence